Update (June 11, 2021): Have a look at the string of posts, below, and the linked decision of this week (on the subject of the disqualification of trial counsel when two of plaintiffs’ lawyers are likely witnesses at trial), and help us understand how there is not a serious problem with our civil litigation system. […]
Update (4/28/2021): Apparently this long-running case might finally go to trial. The two sides disputed whether the case would go to trial before a judge (U.S. District Court Judge Eric C. Tostrud (D. Minn.)) or a judge (U.S. District Court Judge Eric C. Tostrud (D. Minn.)) (plus an advisory jury). Judge Tostrud resolved that dispute […]
The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that “the insurance policy does not cover all of the claimed property damage and a Miller-Shugart settlement agreement that fails to allocate between covered and uncovered claims is not per se unreasonable and unenforceable.” Our prediction, below, was wrong for the most part. While the Minnesota Supreme Court both […]
A post by Karen Cole At last! Minnesota courts are making many district court records available online. You can now search by case number for many district court documents filed after July 1, 2015. Public court documents will now be accessible online for most types of civil and criminal case cases. Only court-generated documents will […]
As all civil litigators know and any experienced litigants, well over 90% of lawsuits settle before trial. That is, many end in compromise settlements, i.e., voluntary transfers of money, most often, precluding the need for any further court or legal action. Nevertheless, as thousands of cases resolve by negotiated settlements, many more thousands of lawsuits […]
Update (February 8, 2021): The post, immediately below, was a complete “prediction failure.” U.S. District Court Judge Wilhemina M. Wright (D. Minn.) rejected Target’s motion for partial summary judgment in this insurance coverage dispute over Target’s losses from a huge data breach and granted the insurer’s motion. We’ll see if Target appeals the decision and […]
Minnesota lawyers, are supposedly self-regulating. Do you get the joke? What in the world is “self-regulation”? (See The Myth of Self-Regulation, Fred C. Zacharias (Minnesota Law Review)). Who thought up this notion of self-regulation, we wonder? (Hint: Lawyers). Seriously, the concept of self-regulation is complicated and nuanced. As such, it is inappropriate to address in […]
Current mortgage interest rates in the United States are around 3%. The one-year LIBOR (London Interbank Offer Rate) is 0.33%. So if you can get a 10% interest rate as a lender, that’s pretty good. Most people (even lawyers) do not normally think of plaintiffs in lawsuits as “lenders” or “creditors” but, in a way, […]
You might not like the procedural requirements for legal malpractice cases under Minnesota law, but you still have to heed them (or lose your case). So held the Minnesota Court of Appeals (AGAIN) this week in Mittelstaedt v. Henney (see pp. 13-14). And you cannot maneuver around the statute by calling your claim a “breach […]
The Minnesota Court of Appeals granted a writ of prohibition in Stephen A. Lawrence, et al. v Rihm Family Companies, et al., halting the trial court’s order that a party had waived its attorney-client privilege. In a nutshell Party A sold a business (X Co) to Party B, delivered the electronic files of X Co. […]